For this week’s assignment, I talked with a friend who works for a
department of the U.S. federal government. Our topic this week addressed rewards and
motivation of employees. Jobs in government
agencies present a unique study of how to motivate and engage employees, since
government managers can’t offer high performing employees the stock options,
and other rewards that are found in the private sector. I wanted to understand what keeps highly educated,
intelligent and ambitious people in government jobs engaged and motivated to
perform, and understand the tactics they use to motivate their employees. (Note the
person I interviewed is not a member of a public employee union.)
Q1: In class this week, one of my readings discussed extrinsic motivation (motivation from external sources…praise, pay, reward, etc.) How does anyone get motivated to work hard in the government–when you don't have stock options, bonus programs? Are there extrinsic motivations?
I think most people (not all, of course) who work for the government are motivated in part by public service and the ability to work for "good" versus working for someone else's "profits." We have seen a great deal of turnover and competition, particularly during the economic boom, with the private sector. Government employees from our agency are always recruited by private sector companies in our field. We can't offer stock options, bonuses, etc., but we can offer the only opportunity to work for a large agency that deals with huge private and public sector challenges… no other company in the world can match that. The opportunity to lead and be promoted is another source of motivation. With the majority of our workforce able to retire over the next several years, there is a tremendous opportunity for advancement if you work hard, play well with others, and show commitment.
For the government employee I interviewed, intrinsic motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2000) is central to his performance. This individual views his job as a service, and his motivation is to continue to provide essential services. He faces subordinates and colleagues who lack that same drive, which is challenging in an environment where traditional extrinsic motivators—bonuses, perks, etc.—are absent. As an individual employee, he appears to have the characteristics—ability, engagement and aspiration—that mark top talent employees in the private sector (Martin & Schmidt, 2010).
Martin, J., & Schmidt, C. (2010). How to keep your top talent. Harvard Business Review, 3-9.
Q1: In class this week, one of my readings discussed extrinsic motivation (motivation from external sources…praise, pay, reward, etc.) How does anyone get motivated to work hard in the government–when you don't have stock options, bonus programs? Are there extrinsic motivations?
I think most people (not all, of course) who work for the government are motivated in part by public service and the ability to work for "good" versus working for someone else's "profits." We have seen a great deal of turnover and competition, particularly during the economic boom, with the private sector. Government employees from our agency are always recruited by private sector companies in our field. We can't offer stock options, bonuses, etc., but we can offer the only opportunity to work for a large agency that deals with huge private and public sector challenges… no other company in the world can match that. The opportunity to lead and be promoted is another source of motivation. With the majority of our workforce able to retire over the next several years, there is a tremendous opportunity for advancement if you work hard, play well with others, and show commitment.
Q: Do people have annual
reviews … and what happens if they have a great one… are salary increases all
based on years in job/pay grade? If pay
increases aren't options, are there other ways people are rewarded?
Yes. We have a performance
management and appraisal system that was instituted about 5 years ago. Employees (and Managers) can be rated
exceptional, fully successful, minimally successful or unsatisfactory. The union contract requires that those rated exceptional
be guaranteed a bonus (given out in March for the previous calendar year's
performance) of at least 2.5% of their salary.
Fully successful individuals get awards on a sliding scale based on the
level (within fully successful) of their rating, but only if there is money
left over after giving all the Exceptional employees their awards. Last year, all performance awards within the
government were capped and not all who were eligible received awards.
Managers must review all employees (face to face) at least
three times a year: once at the beginning
of the calendar year, at the mid-year (in July), and again at the end of the
year. Salary increases also are provided
to employees based on their Grade and their Step and can come either every
year, every 2 years, or every 3 years depending on where the employee is
step-wise within the grade (there are 10 steps). As you progress up the steps, you have to
wait the two or three years before you progress to the next step depending on
what step you are moving from and to.
For example, you'll be a Grade 15, Step 8 for three years before you
become a Grade 15, Step 9. But a Grade
15, Step 1 will become a Grade 15 Step 2 in one year. (I can explain this in greater detail if you
really want to know). Employees also get
cost of living increases each year if Congress passes one -- these are usually
quite small -- one to one and half percent of salary. The last three years we have gone without a
cost of living increase. There are also
career ladder positions where you come into the government at a Grade 9, but
are promoted each successive year (unless you're not at least rated fully
successful) to a Grade 11 and then the third year a Grade 12.
Q: Do you have reward
systems for people who perform exceptionally well?
We have minimal ability to reward employees financially. There are strict limits on the awards you can
provide employees (even trinkets) beyond what is negotiated in the Union
Contract and you are forbidden from providing awards out of your own pocket,
unless they are extremely small (not sure of the $$ amount, but less than
$10). This is to protect employees from
being "bought off" by their manager.
In addition, managers have to purchase food, drinks, etc. for office
parties (Xmas, end of year, summer picnics, birthdays) out of our own
pockets. There's no money provided for
these "team" activities.
Rewards come from the perks of working in the government as I alluded to
above, as well as health insurance (we still pay a portion); the thrift savings
plan (gov't contributes up to 5% of your salary if you contribute that amount);
guaranteed retirement (in addition to Thrift Savings) via Federal Employees
Retirement Service, as well as health care insurance for life. There is tremendous flexibility
in working hours -- start times can be anywhere from 6-10 a.m. and quitting
times from 2:30 - 6:30 p.m. You can
"flex" out to take care of things in the middle of the day -- an hour
or two to go to the doctor and you work an extra hour or two to make up for
it. We also allow people to work at home
up to two-days a week and are initiating a telework pilot program for 100
employees to work at home 100 percent of the time for three months. You can also work 4 9-hour days a week and
take off every other Friday or work 4 10-hour days a week and be off every
Friday (or whatever other day you want).
And employees can work "credit hours" up to 24 hours a pay
period that can be used to take time off.
We also reward our top performers with choice assignments, such as
briefing Senior Leadership, attending national conferences and presenting on
the Agency's behalf, or spending up to 4 months on a detail to a different part
of the Agency to allow them to experience another part of the program they might
be interested in. We also have a small
pool of money that we can give out for "on the spot" activities --
awards are generally $250 or a couple days of time off.
For the government employee I interviewed, intrinsic motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2000) is central to his performance. This individual views his job as a service, and his motivation is to continue to provide essential services. He faces subordinates and colleagues who lack that same drive, which is challenging in an environment where traditional extrinsic motivators—bonuses, perks, etc.—are absent. As an individual employee, he appears to have the characteristics—ability, engagement and aspiration—that mark top talent employees in the private sector (Martin & Schmidt, 2010).
References
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations:
classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. Martin, J., & Schmidt, C. (2010). How to keep your top talent. Harvard Business Review, 3-9.
Good interview, Cynthia. Do you see any of Nohria et al's (2008) four drives being met but this organization? If you could pick one of the drives that government could improve most, which one would it be? What are some ways to do that?
ReplyDeleteI think it's probably the desire to acquire. That seems to be the motivation that is missing and pay is defined by rank and government regulations to a large extent. The desire to bond, comprehend and defend seem to be the motivations that exist in this case. But even if you perform at 10X your colleague, you won't see that reflected in your pay.
DeleteI was just talking about this with my fiance at dinner. Going back to my days in the military, we used to envy the government contractors who would come in, work shifts half as long, get paid twice as much and get federal holidays off and I thought it was interesting to see her mention the "perks" that come with working for the government specifically. I'd imagine that these perks are leveraged as recruiting tools? The extra time off, choice assignments and structured pay increases versus the uncertainty of the corporate world is interesting to say the least.
ReplyDeleteBrian, this person faces much friendly ribbing from his friends over holidays, etc., not to mention the vilification from some members of the media, when in fact they have fewer perks than I have in the private sector, face the same pressure I do, etc. What I had hoped to learn is why not just leave and go to the private sector, and part of it is the motivation of doing what he perceives as a service.
Delete