As I worked through this week’s
readings and thought about what from my personal experience I could share
(that’s meaningful) about work motivation I reflected back to my job as a
technical sales representative at Caisson Laboratories. Caisson is a small competitor
in the biotechnology research supply world that is slowly making a name for
itself. I started working there when it was still fairly young-about six years
ago. At the time it was blossoming; business was expanding and the economic
downturn hadn’t hit yet. Caisson had to that point relied on 100% organic
growth but was desperately in need of the more stable, predictable growth that
comes from a strong sales force. It just so happened I was nearing the end of
my undergraduate and looking for an opportunity to start making a name for
myself. I interviewed, was hired, and put my nose to the grindstone.
Working fulltime slowed my progress
in school, but I wasn’t in a rush to get my degree. I was comfortable where I
was and so I spent another couple of years wrapping it up. Work was going
surprisingly well and I was making great money for a young 20-something. When
it finally came time for me to graduate I was hoping that Caisson would have
bigger and better things for me, but much to my disappointment they offered
nothing, so I went chasing after different suitors. It wasn’t until a couple
years ago when in a management position with another company that I realized
what had actually happened at Caisson.
As it turns out Caisson did have
plans for me. Apparently though my leaders at Caisson had never seen anything
like the Martin and Schmidt (2010) paper. As I look back now they really didn’t
understand what it was going to take to keep me engaged as an employee, nor did
they know how to convey their interest in continuing to develop me as a part of
their staff. Only in passing did the CFO make a comment regarding how the
company would like to “keep someone like [me] on staff.”
It just so happens they made
mistakes in all six of the areas covered by Martin and Schmidt. After more than
two years of the same work I was ready for a change in my daily routine-I was
no longer engaged. They never really tested my abilities and as a result where
to a certain degree ignorant of my potential. Also I was managed by an
individual who had little experience in talent development. In spite of telling
me that I was appreciated and doing much better than any other rep they never
‘put their money where their mouth was’ and offered me bonuses for my
exceptional performance or a higher base salary. Lastly I was rarely given
forewarning about moves the company would make which would affect my work life.
And all these are just to name a few, but all likely reasons why I found it
easy to move on to greener pastures. In other words, they were providing me
with amounted to introjected external motivation (Deci & Ryan, 2000) and I
needed more fulfillment, which falls in line with the research on mentoring
millenials.
I specifically feel that they could
have taken tips from Meister and Willyerd (2010) regarding mentoring
millennials. I believe that I could have remained engaged and personally
fulfilled as they put it at Caisson Labs, but the management didn’t have the in
site to accomplish this. Only the CFO took a personal interest in me and
mentored me as he had time. Unfortunately it proved too little too late. As I
have thought about it more after reading the other papers I realize that all of
them had relevancy in the explanation to my leaving Caisson. Nohria, Groysberg,
and Lee’s (2008) paper on motivation could have served just as well as any of
the others to help me achieve more sustainable motivations. My lack of
engagement discussed earlier could have been remedied by following the examples
given by Heymann and Barrera (2010) from the box or cookie factory.
In short I have realized that
motivation is a very important piece to the puzzle. My personal experience more
than anything has proven that without proper motivation the employees that a
company needs most are likely to leave at the most in opportune times. When I
left Caisson struggled to rebuild the sales force. It was leaning on me like a
crutch to get it through and unfortunately the knowledge and abilities I had
developed weren’t effectively passed on to the next generation, but that is a
story for another day.
·
Heymann, J., Barrera,
M. (2010) Engaging Employees in the Company's Profits and Their Own, Harvard
Business School, pp. 1-28 (full
article)
·
Ryan, R., and Deci, E.
(2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic
Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. No. 25, pp. 54-67 (full article)
·
Martin, J., and
Schmidt, C. (2010). How to Keep Your Top Talent. Harvard
Business Review, pp. 3-9 (full
article)
·
Meister, J., and
Willyerd, K. (2010). Mentoring Millenials. Harvard Business Review, pp. 17-20 (full article)
Great insights, Nik. Were there other employees in your position that were of a different generation? If so, were they more accepting of Caisson's motivation (or lack thereof) techniques? Or do you think Caisson would fail to motivate any employee in your position?
ReplyDeleteThere was a few other reps that were 15-20 years older-and although they liked the culture they under performed in the long run.
ReplyDelete