Managing Marketing
Teams
Journal of Business & Economics Research
Journal of Business & Economics Research
In an ever-changing global market, marketing management has
become an art that requires “constant reassessment of mission, vision and
strategy” (Edwards et al., 2011) to gain and/or maintain competitive advantage
in an unstable business landscape. Edwards et al. (2011) state that information
technology should play a key role in marketing management and should be
implemented by integrating useful technology, and IT personnel, in addition to
training members of a the marketing team to effectively utilize it/them
(Edwards et al. 2011).
It is important to note that in “Managing Marketing Teams” (Edwards
et al., 2011) the authors refer to “marketing teams” as “two or more
individuals collectively working toward the same (marketing) goal (Edwards et
al., 2011, p. 79). These teams are not necessarily comprised of specialized
marketing and communication professionals; they can be of the cross functional
variety as well.
Edwards et al. (2011) assert that by bringing team members
with unique strengths and expertise together, a firm is able to gain a
competitive advantage by more closely and effectively linking business strategy
to customer needs. But as we know, when a diverse group of people is brought
together to accomplish a strategic goal, effectiveness can be slowed or stalled
due to individual differences or lack of understanding of the team’s goal and
direction. Since information exchange processes become more complicated as they
grow beyond a two-way flow, conflict often arises (Hill, 1995).
I believe Hill’s (1995) article from this week’s readings
provides useful information on how to sidestep barriers in the way of achieving
productivity within teams:
·
Set an agenda: ensure that team members have a
clear understanding of the task at hand; this will help avoid confusion and
duplication of effort. By gaining a more complete understanding of the team and
organizational mission, members are able to see how they fit into the equation
and appreciate their role within it (Hill, 1995).
·
Determine what type of teamwork is needed: A
manager must determine what type of teamwork is needed (Hill 1995). In this
week’s readings, Drucker (1992) states that there are three types of teams; they
resemble those of baseball, football and tennis doubles. A manager must
determine the level of coordination is necessary and organize and conduct his
or her team’s structure and actions accordingly (Hill, 1995).
·
Choosing appropriate team members: Hill (1995)
recommends that managers should choose team members not in their own image, but
members with experiences and skills similar to each other, as this results in
an increased level of comfort between them. It should be noted, though, that
team members should not be “clones” of one another, as this does not add value
to the team as a whole.
Additionally, Hinds and Mortensen (2005) state that managers
should create a strong sense of shared identity, a “one team, one fight”
mentality; and shared context, members having access to the same information,
resources and culture (as mentioned above); to aid in preventing and resolving
conflict. Although their research related to conflict in geographically
distributed teams, I believe that it could also be effectively applied in a
marketing team made up of employees from various departments since these team
members are typically removed from each other in their everyday responsibilities.
References
Drucker, P. (1992). There’s more than one kind of team. Wall Street Journal, February 11, 1992,
16. Retrieved from CMGT 500 course pack.
Edwards, J., Honeycutt, A., & Cleveland, C. (2011).
Managing marketing teams. Journal of
Business & Economics Research, 9(1), 79-83.
Hill, L. (1995). Managing your team. Harvard Business School, 1-22.
Hinds, P. H., and Mortensen, M. (2005) Understanding
Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared
Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication. Organization Science, 16, 290-307.
Brian, a key point you brought to light is how the best managers choose team members who can complement their strengths and not reflect their strengths. Too often, I've seen managers who just want to hire clones - to the detriment of their end goals. Both Edwards and Hill seem to support this point.
ReplyDeleteHi Paul,
DeleteI've seen clone syndrome in effect as well. I've also seen managers try to create such a diverse team of employees that their personalities clashed non-stop and chaos erupted at almost any sign of disagreement! The recommendation in this article seems to be a safe medium.
Brian, I liked how you said that these marketing teams allow organizations to be flexible and work closely with customers. This reminds me of when we discussed horizontal structure during Week 3 (feels like a long time ago!). In this type of structure, teams tailor their output to the customer's needs. You mention in the last paragraph that these ideas could be applied in a cross-functional marketing team. Does that contradict the last bullet from Hill which states that team members should have similar skills? Would cross-functional teams have to work harder on their shared identity because they come from different backgrounds?
ReplyDeleteWow, that DOES seem so long ago.
ReplyDeleteI suppose in a cross-functional team, members will have different skills, but could very well have common ground relating to the types of projects they've worked on and the types of industries they've worked in.
I do think that cross-functional teams would have to work harder on achieving a shared identity because even within a small firm like mine (13 people), different departments (creative, programmers, account) have very different mindsets and objectives. I think that making sure that members of the cross-functional team are aware of their role within the larger organization and consequently, their value within the larger organization, would be paramount.